Hawaii Supreme Court· 10/7/1996
State v. Bridges
Citations
- 925 P.2d 357
- 83 Haw. 187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that wiretap interception made in California in compliance with California law, but not with Hawaiian law, was admissible in Hawaiian court
- holding that wiretap interception made in California in compliance with California law, but not with Hawaiian law, was admissible in Hawaiian court
- “the scope of the defendants’ rights, as they might expect to exercise them on a day-to-day basis, is to be found within the realm of [situs] jurisprudence.”
- \if forum state police set out consciously to evade forum state law ... [s]itus law should not be used to reward such schemes\
- “In Hawai'i, we have recognized a number of purposes underlying our exclusionary rule: (1) judicial integrity, State v. Pattioay, 78 Hawai'i 455, 468, 896 P.2d 911, 924 (1995
- police consciously set out to evade law of forum
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, Crandall, Moon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-05-25· cited 88×
- State v. GarciaHawaii Supreme Court· 2001-08-10· cited 82×
- Perry v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-10· cited 59×
- Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court· 2005-05-12· cited 36×
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-09-16· cited 31×
- State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court· 2011-08-09· cited 28×
- State v. McKnight.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-12-31· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. BanvilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-08-13· cited 22×
- Castro v. Administrative Director of the CourtsHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-03-01· cited 10×
- State v. HarvinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-05-29· cited 7×
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-05-02· cited 3×
- State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court· 2011-04-19· cited 1×
- People v. NietoNew York Supreme Court· 2002-07-22· cited 1×
- Amended August 1, 2017 State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel RamirezSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-05-25
- Commonwealth v. SepulvedaMassachusetts Superior Court· 2003-02-06
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Verdugo-UrquidezSupreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 810×
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-11-09· cited 182×
- State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-04· cited 181×
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
- State v. MerinoHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-04-11· cited 129×
- State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-16· cited 110×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 1992-06-05· cited 103×
- The People v. SaikenIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-10-04· cited 94×
- Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-06· cited 76×
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-10-22· cited 71×
- State v. PattioayHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-16· cited 63×
- Burge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-07-09· cited 56×
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-08-16· cited 48×
- State v. MinterSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-08-04· cited 43×
- State v. AluliHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-04-12· cited 39×
- Menefee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1982-02-19· cited 38×
- State v. SentenoHawaii Supreme Court· 1987-09-09· cited 31×
- State v. MeyersHawaii Supreme Court· 1992-02-11· cited 21×
- State v. OkuboHawaii Supreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 17×
- United States v. GerenaD. Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.