Oregon Supreme Court· 3/21/1996

State v. Charboneau

Citations

913 P.2d 308
323 Or. 38
1996 Ore. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the phrase \I think I need a lawyer\ was, at most, an equivocal invocation of the right to counsel
concluding that the defendant’s request, ‘Will I have an opportunity to call an attorney tonight?” was equivocal
holding that “[a] witness’s testimony or an exhibit may not, explicitly and directly, contain an opinion as to a trial witness’s credibility”
noting that “parties often bolster the credibility of their witnesses indirectly and implicitly through the presentation of corroborating evidence”
reiterating that right to counsel under Article I, section 11, is “offense-specific”
discussing interrogation of suspect under Article I, section 12, when defendant had waived his Miranda rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.