Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1/8/1992

State v. Anderson

Citations

835 S.W.2d 600
1992 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Raising issues pertaining to the ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time [on direct appeal] in the appellate court is a practice fraught with peril.”
“Raising issues pertaining to the ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time [on direct appeal] in the appellate court is a practice fraught with peril.”
“Raising issues pertaining to the ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time [on direct appeal] in the appellate court is a practice fraught with peril.”
“Raising issues pertaining to the ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time [on direct appeal] in the appellate court is a practice fraught with peril.”
attempt to shoot victim again after he had been felled and rendered helpless
attempt to shoot victim again after he had been felled and rendered helpless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Wade, Newkirk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

720 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Anderson

1,505 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.