Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/14/2007

State v. Anderson

Citations

733 N.W.2d 128
2007 Minn. LEXIS 318
2007 WL 1704119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[i]t is well settled that an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal” (quotation omitted)
explaining that the state has a “special need” to ensure that probationers comply with conditions
holding acceptance of probation subject to a search condition “ ‘significantly diminished [Anderson’s] reasonable expectation of privacy’ ” (quoting Knights, 534 U.S. at 119–20, 122 S. Ct. at 591, 151 L. Ed. 2d at 504)
refusing to consider a challenge to the validity of a probation condition where the issue was not raised in district court
“We review de novo a district court’s ruling on constitutional questions involving searches and seizures.”
a probationer’s “reasonable expectation of privacy was diminished merely by virtue of his status as a probationer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.