Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/9/2006

State v. Anderson

Citations

281 Kan. 896
136 P.3d 406
2006 Kan. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant’s flight from officers and his action of discarding drugs after officers attempted to arrest him were not relevant in determining whether officers had probable cause to arrest defendant
an appellate court reviews questions of statutoiy interpretation involved in its review of a motion to suppress de novo
Court of Appeals opinion quoted with approval citing Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91, 62 L. Ed. 2d 238, 100 S. Ct. 338 [1979]
Court of Appeals opinion quoted with approval citing Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85, 91, 100 S.Ct. 338, 62 L.Ed.2d 238 [1979]
“State bears the burden to demonstrate that a challenged seizure or search was lawful.”
in determining legislative intent, court can presume the legislature knows the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.