Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/11/2012

State v. Anderson

Citations

276 P.3d 200
294 Kan. 450
2012 WL 1649707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

accepting defense argument that issue involved defendant’s fundamental right to testify and a legal question
accepting defense argument that the issue involved defendant's fundamental right to testify and a legal question
reciting the general rule and the three recognized exceptions including when consideration is necessary to serve the ends of justice and prevent denial of fundamental rights
finding prosecutor erred in referring to defendant as a “little, little man” and asking for “redemption” for victim, as this request was akin to asking for justice for victim and improperly diverted jury’s attention from its task
endorsing Taylor and State v. McKinney, 221 Kan. 691, Syl., 561 P.2d 432 [1977], by rejecting the defendant's argument that district court had a duty to advise him about his right to testify and his right against self- incrimination and then to secure a choice from him on the record
eyewitness' in-court identification of defendant not critical to prosecution's case because substantial additional evidence implicated defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.