Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/8/2009
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 220 P.3d 1273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prosecutor may properly argue that the State has \met and exceeded\ its burden of proof
- holding that this court presumes juries follow the trial court’s instructions
- holding that prosecutor’s comments were improper but not prejudicial
- finding that, in context, prosecutor's comments characterizing the defendant's testimony as \'ridiculous'\ and that the State's witnesses were \'just telling the truth'\ were not expressions of personal opinion
- “The trial court’s instructions regarding the presumption of innocence minimized any negative impact on the jury”
- defendant did not demonstrate improper fill-in-the-blank argument was so flagrant or ill intentioned as to result in incurable prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Penoyar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court· 2012-06-14· cited 1,088×
- State v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 277×
- State v. DyeWashington Supreme Court· 2013-09-26· cited 170×
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-07-17· cited 122×
- State v. McCrevenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-05· cited 90×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-11-18· cited 78×
- State v. VenegasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-13· cited 77×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-11-24· cited 69×
- State v. CurtissCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-06· cited 66×
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-08· cited 65×
- State v. EmeryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-04-13· cited 52×
- State Of Washington v. Harun OsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-01-25· cited 33×
- State v. SakellisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-04· cited 26×
- State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-06-17· cited 25×
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-11-28· cited 20×
- State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-11-07· cited 18×
- In re the Personal Restraint of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-07-02· cited 17×
- State Of Washington v. Thomas Joseph FeelyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-02-22· cited 12×
- State of Washington v. Michael James McNearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-03-31· cited 11×
- State v. KalebaughCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-02-11· cited 8×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court· 1990-07-26· cited 730×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 498×
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 392×
- State v. McKenzieWashington Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 321×
- State v. DhaliwalWashington Supreme Court· 2003-11-20· cited 297×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-12-08· cited 181×
- State v. ReedWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 175×
- State v. HopsonWashington Supreme Court· 1989-09-14· cited 162×
- State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court· 1991-09-19· cited 140×
- State v. Casteneda-PerezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-20· cited 111×
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-26· cited 107×
- State v. PapadopoulosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-11· cited 76×
- State v. CharltonWashington Supreme Court· 1978-10-12· cited 70×
- State v. TraweekCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-03-07· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.