Supreme Court of Connecticut· 3/13/2001

State v. Anderson

Citations

255 Conn. 425
773 A.2d 287
2001 Conn. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

\[a]ppellate courts possess an inherent supervisory authority over the administration of justice\ [emphasis added]
“[appellate courts possess an inherent supervisory authority over the administration of justice” [emphasis added]
‘‘[d]ue process seeks to assure a defendant a fair trial, not a perfect one’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
‘‘[t]he trial court . . . was in the best position to assess the credibility of the jurors’’
when case involves error affecting framework within which trial proceeds, rather than simply error in trial process itself, resulting trial is necessarily rendered fundamentally unfair, and structural error doctrine precludes harmless error review
when case involves error affecting framework within which trial proceeds, rather than simply error in trial process itself, resulting trial is necessarily rendered fundamentally unfair, and structural error doctrine precludes harmless error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.