Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 937 S.W.2d 851
  • 1996 Tenn. LEXIS 583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the “test to determine whether an individual is in custody for purposes of Miranda is objective from the viewpoint of the individual being questioned, and [the] unarticulated, subjective view of law enforcement officials that such individual is not a suspect is irrelevant.”
  • uncommunicat-ed belief that person is a suspect is irrelevant to Fifth Amendment custody determination
  • uncommunicated belief that person is a suspect is irrelevant to Fifth Amendment custody determination
  • uncommunicated belief that person is a suspect is irrelevant to Fifth Amendment custody determination
  • test to determine whether a person is in custody and entitled to Miranda1 warnings prior to interrogation is “whether a reasonable person in the suspect’s position would consider himself or herself deprived of freedom of movement to a degree associated with a formal arrest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Birch, Drowota, Reid, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

134 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.