Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 76 S.W.3d 275
  • 2002 WL 1071916

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding evidence is legally relevant if its probative value outweighs the risks that the evidence will result in unfair prejudice, will confuse or mislead the jury, or is merely cumulative of other evidence
  • “Legal relevance weighs the probative value of the evidence against its costs-unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, waste of time, or cumu-lativeness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duane Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.