New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/25/1994

State v. Anderson

Citations

881 P.2d 29
118 N.M. 284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that questions about the accuracy of results goes to the weight of the evidence and is therefore a jury question
concluding that DNA evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene was helpful to the jury
rejecting claim that presentations, as opposed to formal publications, were inadequate as peer review
rejecting claim that presentations, as opposed to formal publications, were inadequate as peer review
acknowledging vigorous cross-examination and presentation of rebuttal experts as \the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
addressing the FBI’s method for determining the probability 4 of a coincidental DNA match

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Franchini, Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.