Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/23/2015

Solomon v. State

Citations

303 Kan. 512
364 P.3d 536
2015 Kan. LEXIS 1022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that under Kansas law, the case or controversy requirement means that (1) a party must have standing; (2) the issue cannot be moot; (3) the issue must be ripe; and (4) the issue cannot present a political question
holding Chief Judge of judicial district had standing to challenge statute prospectively altering chief judge selection procedure when judge alleged in declaratory judgment petition that the legislation \directly affected\ his \status and other legal relations\
reciting standard of review applicable to district court's resolution of standing and ripeness claims in action seeking declaratory judgment that legislation violated separation of powers under state constitution
a claim must have \taken fixed and final shape rather than remaining nebulous and contingent\
\The Kansas Supreme Court has the authority and duty to preserve the constitutional division of powers against disruptive intrusion by one branch of government into the sphere of a coordinate branch of government.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen, Stegall, Malone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.