Skip to main content

Malone v. State

Citations

  • 253 S.W.3d 253
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 584
  • 2008 WL 1958933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurors can rationally find that evidence showing more than mere presence sufficiently tends to connect a defendant to the crime
  • holding that standard for evaluating sufficiency of evidence for corroboration under accomplice-witness rule applies when evaluating sufficiency of evidence for corroboration under covert-agent rule
  • holding that standard for evaluating sufficiency of evidence for corroboration under accomplice-witness rule applies when evaluating sufficiency of evidence for corroboration under covert-agent rule
  • holding that standard for evaluating sufficiency of evidence for corroboration under accomplice-witness rule applies when evaluating sufficiency of evidence for corroboration under covert-agent rule
  • holding that the court must eliminate the accomplice testimony and determine if the remaining evidence tends to connect the accused with the commission of the crime
  • holding that the court must eliminate the accomplice testimony and determine if the remaining evidence tends to connect the accused with the commission of the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

281 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Malone v. State

205 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.