Solomon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s “timely presence at the scene of the crime and the circumstances of his discovery there [provided] sufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony”
• concluding that defendant’s “timely presence at the scene of the crime and the circumstances of his discovery there [provided] sufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony”
• corroboration supplied for accomplice’s testimony to sustain school burglary by appellant’s timely presence at the scene of the crime and the circumstances of finding him there — police officers discovered appellant crouched behind one of the school’s air conditioning units

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gilmore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-22· cited 17×
• Kegler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-08-15· cited 8×
• Clarence Kegler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-08-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Sweat v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1969-05-09· cited 27×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-12-01· cited 7×