Skip to main content

Skinner v. State

Citations

  • 956 S.W.2d 532
  • 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 33
  • 1997 WL 266188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence sufficient to uphold capital murder conviction when appellant was seen with weapon similar to that used in shootings, and appellant had been seen with victims short time prior to shootings
  • testifying about topics addressed in document does not place document within meaning of phrase “use before the jury”
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that his voluntary intoxication supported lesser-included charge of murder to capital murder
  • \The propriety of the question which the defendant sought to ask is determinative of the issue.\
  • “The propriety of the question which the defendant sought to ask is determinative of the issue.”
  • penal code section 8.04(a) bars the use of evidence of voluntary intoxication to negate the culpable mental state of a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, McCormick, Overstreet, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

266 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Skinner v. State

108 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.