Skip to main content

Ortiz v. State

Citations

  • 93 S.W.3d 79
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 185
  • 2002 WL 31116634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant must show that complained-of evidence was inadmissible to properly bring ineffective assistance claim based on counsel = s failure to object
  • holding defensive instruction on suicide not required because it is not a statutorily-enumerated defense and serves merely to negate certain elements of the offense
  • stating that where there is a possibility that the conduct arose from legitimate trial strategy, the court may not find the counsel ineffective on direct appeal
  • noting that to establish ineffective assistance based on a failure to object, an appellant must show that the trial court would have erred in overruling these objections
  • providing that to show deficient performance, appellant must show evidence was inadmissible
  • stating that formal proceedings need not have been initiated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Keller, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

533 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ortiz v. State

203 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.