Bargas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the evidence was legally sufficient because the jury heard the evidence and inconsistencies and still found the essential elements met beyond a reasonable doubt
• holding that outcry testimony retains probative value even if contradictory evidence admitted
• providing that the jury could have considered a therapist’s testimony offering why a child complainant had imperfect perception of the time or dates of incidents
• holding extraneous-offense evidence was probative to rebut appellant’s theory that allegations were fabricated
• holding extraneous-offense evidence was probative to rebut appellant's theory that allegations were fabricated
• holding extraneous-offense evidence was probative to rebut appellant’s theory that allegations were fabricated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).