Skip to main content

Enriquez v. State

Citations

  • 21 S.W.3d 277
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 66
  • 2000 WL 791959

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the appellate court must examine the entire record instead of plucking certain evidence from the record and examining it in a vacuum
  • holding trial court erred by giving lesser-included offense instruction for lesser amount of marijuana because chemist only tested one bundle of several in evidence
  • stating that the appellate court must examine the entire record instead of plucking certain evidence from the record and examining it in a vacuum
  • holding trial court erred by giving lesser-included offense instruction for lesser amount of marijuana because chemist only tested one bundle of bundles in evidence
  • requiring us to consider all evidence presented at trial to determine whether a lesser-included charge is warranted
  • evaluating whether defendant convicted of delivering 50 to 2000 pounds of marihuana was entitled to lesser-included offense instruction on delivery of 5 to 50 pounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Johnson, Mansfield, Keller, Holland, Womack, Keasler, Price, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.