Nunfio v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error in the denial of a proper question which prevents the intelligent exercise of peremptory challenges is an abuse of discretion, not subject to harm analysis
• holding that error in the denial of a proper question which prevents the intelligent exercise of peremptory challenges is an abuse of discretion, not subject to harm analysis
• holding that error in the denial of a proper question which prevents the intelligent exercise of peremptory challenges is an abuse of discretion, not subject to harm analysis
• holding that error in the denial of a proper question which prevents the intelligent 5 exercise of peremptory challenges is an abuse of discretion, not subject to harm analysis
• trial court should have permitted voire dire regarding panel's prejudice when a nun was the victim of rape
• \We hold that error in the denial of a proper question which prevents the intelligent exercise of one's peremptory challenges constitutes an abuse of discretion and is not subject to a harm analysis[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).