Skinner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court cited 27 Am.Jur. Incest § 15, for the proposition that in a prosecution for incest, evidence of incestuous intercourse between the parties other than those charged in the indictment is, if not too remote, admissible
• wherein the court cited 27 Am.Jur. Incest § 15, for the proposition that in a prosecution for incest, evidence of incestuous intercourse between the parties other than those charged in the indictment is, if not too remote, admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-02-12· cited 35×
• Isbell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1976-02-03· cited 27×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-12-16· cited 14×
• Ex Parte Rodgers
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1989-01-13· cited 9×
• Staten v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-09-20· cited 8×
• Patterson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-09-08· cited 7×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Skinner v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1952-02-19· cited 14×