Skip to main content

Hendrix v. State

Citations

  • 150 S.W.3d 839
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 10216
  • 2004 WL 2600393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court’s erroneous disjunctive charge on one of several indictments against the appellant was harmful error under Almanza standard because the erroneous charge made it possible for the jury to return a nonunanimous verdict
  • holding that charges submitting instances of penetration and contact occurring in the same transaction did not deprive the appellant of a unanimous verdict because “all of the jurors who believed there was penetration necessarily also believed that antecedent contact had occurred”
  • “Because erroneous charge made it possible for the jury to return a less than unanimous guilty verdict, we find the charge error was harmful.”
  • describing the holding in Owens
  • describing the holding in Owens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John S. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.