Skip to main content

Arnold v. State

Citations

  • 234 S.W.3d 664
  • 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 4759
  • 2007 WL 2729409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • that fragments of testimony “cannot be plucked out of the record and examined in a vacuum.”
  • that fragments of 16 testimony “cannot be plucked out of the record and examined in a vacuum.”
  • “[C]ourts have typically found that a manslaughter instruction was required based on some evidence that the gun discharged accidentally or that the defendant only intended to frighten the complainant.”
  • “There is no question here that the first prong of the test is satisfied: it is well-established that manslaughter is a lesser-included offense of murder… The only difference between the two offenses is the mental state required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eva M. Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.