Skip to main content

Skinner v. State

Citations

  • 987 So. 2d 1172
  • 2006 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 175
  • 2006 WL 2457527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a challenge similar to the one at issue was jurisdictional and therefore not subject to the bar against successive petitions in Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb, McMillan, Baschab, Shaw, Wise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.