Supreme Court of Florida· 5/6/2004

Power v. State

Citations

886 So. 2d 952
2004 WL 1057688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting contention that rale 4-3.5(d)(4) violated appellant’s right of access to courts under article I, section 21, of the Florida Constitution
stating that this Court will not over rule the trial court’s conclusion that counsel’s performance was not deficient when the record demonstrates that evidence that the defendant interfered with trial counsel’s ability to obtain and present mitigating evidence
upholding lower court’s finding that counsel was not deficient when defendant “interfered with trial counsel’s ability to obtain and present mitigating evidence”
upholding lower court’s finding that counsel was not deficient when defendant “interfered with trial counsel’s ability to obtain and present mitigating evidence”
rejecting Power’s claim that his execution is constitutionally prohibited because Power was insane as premature
rejecting Power’s claim that his execution is constitutionally prohibited because Power was insane as premature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.