Supreme Court of Florida· 3/7/1996

Rose v. State

Citations

675 So. 2d 567
1996 WL 97463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that counsel's decision not to call certain witnesses was a reasoned decision since it was apparent that the State could have successfully impeached them
finding that counsel was ineffective at the penalty phase when failing to present evidence of severe mental disturbance and evidence of the defendant's alcoholism and mistreatment as a child
finding defense counsel ineffective at the penalty phase for failing to present evidence of severe mental disturbance and for failing to present evidence of defendant's alcoholism and mistreatment as a child
vacating death sentence and remanding for a new penalty phase where counsel was ineffective during the penalty phase
vacating death sentence and remanding for a new penalty phase where counsel was ineffective during the penalty phase
defendant had previously been characterized as schizoid and suffered from organic brain damage and a longstanding personality disorder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.