Skip to main content

Green v. State

Citations

  • 975 So. 2d 1090
  • 2008 WL 248413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim “is procedurally barred because it was neither raised in Green’s 3.851 motion nor addressed by the trial court”
  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to impeach with one statement because counsel impeached witness with many other inconsistent statements
  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing - 48 - to impeach with one statement because counsel impeached witness with many other inconsistent statements
  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to impeach with one statement because counsel impeached witness with many other inconsistent statements
  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to impeach with one statement because counsel impeached witness with many other inconsistent statements
  • holding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to impeach with one statement because counsel impeached witness with many other inconsistent statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.