Shaw v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the parties there erred in relying on pre-rule case law and failing to analyze joinder under Rule 19 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure
• stating that “[ajlthough [a Mississippi case] was decided subsequent to the adoption of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, its failure to consider the implications of [MRCP] Rule 19 renders the validity of its non-joinder holding questionable”
• “One of the most fundamental and long-established rules of law in Mississippi is that the [appellate court] will not review matters on appeal that were not raised at the trial court level.”
• following federal precedents applying federal counterpart to our Rule 19

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).