Skip to main content

Lynch v. State

Citations

  • 2 So. 3d 47
  • 2008 WL 4809783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that unless a defendant makes both showings, it cannot be said that the conviction resulted from a breakdown in the adversary process that renders the result unreliable
  • “[T]he burden is on the defendant to affirmatively satisfy both prongs of the Strickland framework.”
  • “[The appellant] is not entitled to relief on his cumulative error claim because the alleged individual claims of error are all without merit, and, therefore, the contention of cumulative error is similarly without merit.”
  • applying the Fai-son test to section 787.01(1)(a)2.
  • applying the Faison test to section 787.01(1)(a)2.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince, Wells, Anstead, Pariente, Lewis, Canady, Polston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.