Skip to main content

Ortiz v. State

Citations

  • 968 So. 2d 681
  • 2007 WL 3375230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a defendant’s postconviction claims are legally sufficient, the trial court must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claims
  • “[T]he trial court must attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the claims in order to properly issue a summary denial.”; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5
  • “There is nothing in the portions of the record presented to this Court that would suggest how Appellant’s alleged depression and delusions may have affected his competence to enter a plea. Consequently, an evidentiary hearing was necessary to resolve this issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.