Indiana Supreme Court· 4/22/2002

Ortiz v. State

Citations

766 N.E.2d 370
2002 Ind. LEXIS 331
2002 WL 652108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

revising consecutive thirty-year sentences to concurrent terms where 16 trial court failed to adequately identify, explain, and evaluate aggravating circumstances used to impose consecutive sentences
revising consecutive thirty-year sentences to concurrent terms where trial court failed to adequately identify, explain, and evaluate aggravating circumstances used to impose consecutive sentences
revising 30 year consecutive sentences on child molesting counts to run concurrent- ly
claim of failure to instruct jury on territorial jurisdiction waived because defendant failed to tender proposed instruction
State presented sufficient circumstantial evidence, in the form of the victim's testimony, that the offense occurred in Indiana
\failure to tender an instruction results in waiver of the issue for review\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.