Skip to main content

Morris v. State

Citations

  • 361 S.W.3d 649
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1664
  • 2011 WL 6057840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that law enforcement officer ‘ ‘with a significant amount of experience with child sex abuse cases may be qualified” to discuss grooming
  • recognizing that law enforcement officer \with a significant amount of experience with child sex abuse cases may be qualified\ to discuss grooming
  • holding that the phenomenon of grooming children for sexual molestation is an appropriate topic for expert testimony and noting that 10 circuits and 38 states have addressed grooming, with most reaching the same conclusion
  • explaining that expert testimony regarding grooming behavior was useful to the jury and still involves matters beyond the understanding of the jury
  • explaining that per Rule 702, expert testimony does not have to be based upon science at all
  • noting that testimony about grooming in a child sexual assault case is useful to the jury because it is beyond the jury’s common knowledge and understanding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Cochran, Hervey, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

143 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.