Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 3/8/2005
Hall v. State
Citations
- 161 S.W.3d 142
- 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1742
- 2005 WL 147107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the combined effects of counsel’s failure to object to cross-examination about inadmissible extraneous offenses and to improper charge so undermined the trial process that defendant received ineffective assistance
- trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to \numerous ... prejudicial matters\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morriss, Ross, Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barnett v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-06-14· cited 51×
- Patterson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-10-26· cited 50×
- Aldrich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-08-25· cited 50×
- My Thi Tieu v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-11-19· cited 48×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-05-25· cited 45×
- Walker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-02-22· cited 45×
- Jackson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-08-12· cited 41×
- Pardue v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-04-04· cited 25×
- West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-05-26· cited 24×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-03-31· cited 24×
- Hatley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-08-25· cited 21×
- Ledbetter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-11-21· cited 21×
- Caldwell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-11-29· cited 13×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-03-04· cited 10×
- James Earl Lemons v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2013-04-04· cited 9×
- Gonzalez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2011-08-24· cited 5×
- Riley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-07-29· cited 4×
- Holmes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2009-02-04· cited 2×
- Charles Ray Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2014-12-15
- Rhonda Renee Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-04-20
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-09· cited 6,445×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-13· cited 6,146×
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-10· cited 4,984×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-04-23· cited 3,337×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 3,060×
- Dewberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-20· cited 2,718×
- Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-19· cited 2,687×
- Hutch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-03· cited 1,524×
- Tong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 1,364×
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-25· cited 644×
- Heidelberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-09-15· cited 488×
- Herron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-09· cited 482×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-01-20· cited 437×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.