Benson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Factual dispute over element of fear necessary in robbery and identification of assailant was properly resolved by jury.
• in habitual offender portion of indictment, failure to give dates of prior convictions did not make indictment fatally defective when other information in indictment afforded defendant access to dates
• prospective juror said that he had read in the newspaper that the defendant was a habitual offender
• prospective juror said that he had read in the newspaper that the defendant was a habitual offender
• where dates of prior convictions provided in indictment, failure to also state them in habitual offender section of indictment did not render indictment fatally defective
• prospective juror said that he had read in the newspaper that the defendant was a habitual offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).