Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/22/1992
Sterling v. State
Citations
- 830 S.W.2d 114
- 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 103
- 1992 WL 79217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the presence of seven uniformed deputies in the courtroom at a jury trial was not inherently prejudicial
- presence of seven armed guards did not deprive defendant of an impartial jury or presumption of innocence absent evidence of prejudice
- \We are not at liberty to presume the existence of facts not shown by the record.\
- “We are not at liberty to presume the existence of facts not shown by the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maloney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-24· cited 1,521×
- Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-26· cited 1,429×
- Rhoades v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-02· cited 959×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-07· cited 564×
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-04-12· cited 402×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-07· cited 365×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 294×
- Matamoros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-14· cited 289×
- Nobles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-10· cited 267×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 245×
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-10· cited 202×
- Buntion v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-27· cited 191×
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-12· cited 127×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-06-04· cited 108×
- Garner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-01-26· cited 97×
- Nieto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-05-09· cited 85×
- Otting v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-02-03· cited 59×
- Holmes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1998-03-11· cited 57×
- Moranza v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-04-10· cited 54×
- Reed v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-06-24· cited 53×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
- Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 926×
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 804×
- Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-25· cited 445×
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-11· cited 429×
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-06· cited 298×
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-03· cited 297×
- Whitsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-09-19· cited 278×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-27· cited 265×
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-27· cited 247×
- Marquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-01-14· cited 246×
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-31· cited 241×
- Caldwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 241×
- Tennard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-30· cited 232×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 229×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-09-13· cited 216×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.