Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/21/1996

Ford v. State

Citations

919 S.W.2d 107
1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 22
1996 WL 71517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that even though appellant failed to object each time objectionable evidence was offered, appellant preserved error by requesting that his objection extend to any witness who testified regarding the matter
holding defendant waived error with respect to admission of photograph of him wearing dark coat because same information was admitted in another form without objection
holding running objection as “to any and all impact evidence” and “to all witnesses” testifying to such was sufficient to preserve claim
holding running objection as “to any and all impact evidence” and “to all witnesses” testifying to such was sufficient to preserve claim
holding defendant preserved Rule 403 objection to second witness’s victim-impact testimony when earlier request for running Rule-403 objection made and granted during context of first witness’s similar victim-impact testimony
stating that a running objection is not appropriate to preserve error across different witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, Baird, Maloney, Meyers, Mansfield, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

117 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.