Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 119 S.W.3d 412
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7534
  • 2003 WL 22026348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence of the defendant’s actions involving the child victim and third party children was relevant to show the defendant’s state of mind and relationship with the complainant
  • holding that extraneous sexual assaults of the child victim were a logical and necessary rebuttal of major defense theory of fabrication
  • holding that it was difficult to separate acts against third parties from acts against complainant because acts were directed at group
  • holding that it was difficult to separate acts against third parties from acts against complainant because acts were directed at group
  • holding that it was difficult to separate acts against third parties from acts against complainant because acts were directed at group
  • holding that evidence of the defendant’s actions involving the child victim and third party children was relevant to show the defendant’s state of mind and relationship with the complainant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Gardner, Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.