Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 738 S.W.2d 207
  • 1987 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[Appellant] contends that the trial court erred by permitting evidence of an inadmissible extraneous offense to be placed before the jury.\
  • “If a State’s witness has no complicity in the offense for which an accused is on trial, his or her testimony is not that of an accomplice witness whatever may have been his complicity with the accused in the commission of other offenses.”
  • noting “[none of the judge’s] statements were refuted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Onion, Teague, White, Davis, Duncan, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.