Skip to main content

Wyatt v. State

Citations

  • 23 S.W.3d 18
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 46
  • 2000 WL 526330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing witness to testify as an expert, even though she was not licensed
  • holding that same transaction contextual evidence of sexual assault was necessary to prove that the murder was intentional by showing that the sexual assault was the motive for the murder
  • holding that same transaction contextual evidence of sexual assault was necessary to prove that the murder was intentional by showing that the sexual assault was the motive for the murder
  • holding that the first factor is related to the strength of the evidence that appellant in fact committed the extraneous offense
  • holding that the first factor is related to the strength of the evidence that appellant in fact committed the extraneous offense
  • holding that the evidentiary rule “clearly contemplates that some leading questions are acceptable at the trial court’s discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,081 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wyatt v. State

108 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.