Skip to main content

Hayden v. State

Citations

  • 66 S.W.3d 269
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 105
  • 2001 WL 1414287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice was sufficient where the defendant 5 did not dispute actual notice of the uncharged misconduct through the produced witness statements
  • concluding that delivery of witness statements detailing extraneous offenses can satisfy notice requirement
  • assuming that witness statements that did not appear in record were as prosecutor represented them to be
  • holding defendant had notice that State would introduce extraneous offense evidence where State delivered to defendant the witness statements before trial
  • holding defendant had notice that State would introduce extraneous offense evidence where State delivered to defendant the witness statements before trial
  • noting that whether delivery “constitutes reasonable notice depends in part on the time of that delivery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Price, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.