Dennis Eugene Allen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding error in exempting expert from the Rule was harmless in light of entire trial record
• holding error in exempting expert from the rule was harmless in part because focus of expert’s testimony was earlier interview with child' complainant arid not complainant’s trial testimony
• “[T]he witness sequestration rule[ ] prevents witnesses from tailoring their testimony to fit that of other witnesses and enhances the jury’s ability to detect falsehood by exposing inconsistencies in testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).