Skip to main content

McDonald v. State

Citations

  • 462 S.W.2d 40
  • 1970 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence legally sufficient to support aggravated assault conviction based on victim’s testimony even though testimony was inconsistent
  • evidence legally sufficient to support aggravated assault conviction based on prosecuting witness’ testimony even though testimony inconsistent
  • evidence legally sufficient to support aggravated assault conviction based on prosecuting witness's testimony even though her testimony was inconsistent
  • “The fact that a witness makes contradictory or inconsistent statements does not destroy his testimony as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.