Skip to main content

Gipson v. State

Citations

  • 844 S.W.2d 738
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 208
  • 1992 WL 334145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming decision holding improper an officer’s implied inducement to defendant that his confession might be used for him or on his behalf
  • affirming court of appeals = decision holding improper an officer = s implied inducement to defendant that his confession might be used for him or on his behalf
  • finding error harmful without remand because trial court specifically relied upon erroneously admitted confession
  • concluding harmless error analysis should be conducted instead
  • concluding harmless error analysis should be conducted instead
  • concluding harmless error analysis should be conducted instead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Clinton, McCormick, Campbell, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Gipson v. State

60 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.