Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 9/14/1994
England v. State
Citations
- 887 S.W.2d 902
- 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 91
- 1994 WL 497284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the entrapment defense contains a subjective component C that the accused was actually induced to commit the charged offense C as well as an objective component
- to prevail on entrapment defense, evidence must show that police conduct was such that an ordinary law-abiding person would have been induced to commit the crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Maloney, Miller, Baird, Overstreet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-03· cited 1,327×
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-23· cited 638×
- Pondexter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-16· cited 349×
- Vega, Jose Luis Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-03-20· cited 213×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-02· cited 118×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-22· cited 95×
- MacIas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-01-29· cited 57×
- Hernandez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-02-12· cited 55×
- Walker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-02-22· cited 45×
- Resendez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-03-03· cited 41×
- Crivello v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-09-21· cited 32×
- Torres v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-10-14· cited 30×
- Flores v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-07-25· cited 26×
- McGann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-11-16· cited 25×
- Liggins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1998-10-28· cited 23×
- Hoitt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-08-29· cited 19×
- Guia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-04-17· cited 19×
- Reginald Levon Cook v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-03-20· cited 14×
- Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1999-07-30· cited 8×
- LaPointe v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-07-28· cited 8×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-19· cited 1,793×
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-05-19· cited 1,587×
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 910×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 553×
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-29· cited 528×
- People v. CalvanoNew York Court of Appeals· 1972-03-23· cited 342×
- Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 231×
- People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-03-15· cited 163×
- Cruz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-03-07· cited 140×
- Butts v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1921-05-04· cited 130×
- Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 120×
- Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 111×
- People v. JamiesonMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-12· cited 96×
- Grossman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-07-21· cited 89×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-16· cited 64×
- Bush v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-18· cited 59×
- Langford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-03-28· cited 53×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.