Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 176 S.W.3d 821
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1857
  • 2005 WL 2861117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 404(b) literally conditions the admissibility of other-crimes evidence on the State's compliance with the notice provision contained therein
  • holding that Rule 404(b) literally conditions the admissibility of other-crimes evidence on the State's compliance with the notice provision contained therein
  • holding that evidence admitted in violation of rule of evidence 404(b)’s notice requirement is not harmful error if defendant not surprised by evidence
  • holding that evidence admitted in violation of rule of evidence 404(b)‘s notice requirement is not harmful error if defendant not surprised by evidence
  • holding that Rule 404(b) literally conditions the admissibility of other-crimes evidence on the State's compliance with the notice provision contained therein
  • holding that Rule 404(b) literally conditions the admissibility of other-crimes evidence on the State's compliance with the notice provision contained therein

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.