Skip to main content

McDonald v. State

Citations

  • 148 S.W.3d 598
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 8855
  • 2004 WL 2222648

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a mistrial was not warranted by prosecutor’s argument that he thought the testifying victim was “very believable”
  • intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire can be inferred from the accused’s conduct and remarks, as well as the surrounding circumstances
  • intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire can be inferred from defendant’s conduct, remarks, and all surrounding circumstances, including a common pattern of similar acts
  • instruction cured prosecutor’s statement that he thought victim was “very believable”
  • instruction cured prosecutor's statement that he thought victim was “very believable”
  • instruction cured prosecutor's statement that he thought victim was ―very believable‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard H. Edelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.