Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 10/5/2004
McDonald v. State
Citations
- 148 S.W.3d 598
- 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 8855
- 2004 WL 2222648
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a mistrial was not warranted by prosecutor’s argument that he thought the testifying victim was “very believable”
- intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire can be inferred from the accused’s conduct and remarks, as well as the surrounding circumstances
- intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire can be inferred from defendant’s conduct, remarks, and all surrounding circumstances, including a common pattern of similar acts
- instruction cured prosecutor’s statement that he thought victim was “very believable”
- instruction cured prosecutor's statement that he thought victim was “very believable”
- instruction cured prosecutor's statement that he thought victim was ―very believable‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard H. Edelman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-23· cited 638×
- Carlos Ferrer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-08-19
- Roy Mathre v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-02-14
- Ronnie Joe Mason v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2009-08-26
- Marie Gallegos v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2009-08-26
- Jeremy Wayne Matthews v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2009-12-30
- McDonald, Robert CharlesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-23
- Jose Avitua Soto v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-08-31
- Jermaine C. Mitchell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-08-31
- Antonio Campos Salgado A/K/A Antonio Campos-Arrellano v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2012-06-21
- Ex Parte: Manuel CisnerosTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2013-03-28
- James Randall Downs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2010-08-04
- Meria James Bradley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-02-25
- Enrique Zamora v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2013-03-13
- Francisco Horta Licea v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2010-08-27
- Eduardo Santamaria v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-01-20
- Christopher David Swofford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-11-12
- John D. Garcia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2021-01-21
- Marquis Deshawn Clark Jr. v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2021-11-24
- Kevin Debnam v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2023-06-28
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 2,816×
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-22· cited 1,412×
- Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-03· cited 1,327×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-05-05· cited 762×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 727×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-01· cited 640×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 553×
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-05-29· cited 528×
- Camacho v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-13· cited 440×
- Sauceda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-10· cited 329×
- Webb v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-12-28· cited 214×
- Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-29· cited 136×
- Page v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-09· cited 113×
- Ranson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-09· cited 45×
- Hayden v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-01-07· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.