Skip to main content

Renteria v. State

Citations

  • 206 S.W.3d 689
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1919
  • 2006 WL 2860988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that various witnesses’ testimony at hearing stating that appellant could receive fair trial supported court’s denial of motion to change venue
  • concluding that admission of constitutionally relevant evidence is not required if it is otherwise objectionable under state law
  • concluding that admission of constitutionally relevant evidence is not required if it is otherwise objectionable under state law
  • concluding that admission of constitutionally relevant evidence is not required if it is otherwise objectionable under state law
  • concluding that admission of constitutionally relevant evidence is not required if it is otherwise objectionable under state law
  • holding that even if the omitted information had been included in the probable cause affidavit, sufficient probable cause still existed to issue the search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

244 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Renteria v. State

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.