Skip to main content

Reyes v. State

Citations

  • 938 S.W.2d 718
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 219
  • 1996 WL 628211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Geesa v. State , 820 S.W.2d 154 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), created \an absolute systemic requirement\ that the jury be instructed on reasonable-doubt standard
  • stating that Geesa created an absolute systemic requirement that jury be instructed on reasonable-doubt standard
  • stating that Geesa created an absolute systemic requirement that jury be instructed on reasonable-doubt standard
  • stating that prior to Geesa v. State, this Court “employed the ‘reasonable-hypothesis-of-innocence’ analytical construct to review the sufficiency of the evidence in circumstantial evidence cases”
  • determining that Geesa created an absolute systemic requirement for instruction on reasonable doubt
  • determining that Geesa created an absolute systemic requirement for instruction on reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Meyers, Mansfield, Keller, Mecormick, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.