Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 332 S.W.3d 483
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 326
  • 2011 WL 798667

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, in an aggravated-sexual-assault case, appellant was not egregiously harmed by charge error that presented the jury with a much broader chronological perimeter than is permitted by law
  • noting that, when conducting egregious-harm analysis, courts consider any part of record “which may illuminate the actual, not just theoretical, harm to the accused”
  • noting that jury is presumed to have understood and followed trial court’s jury-charge instructions absent evidence to the contrary
  • reiterating that egregiously harmful errors are those that, among other things, “vitally affect the defensive theory”
  • noting that jury is presumed to have understood and followed trial court’s jury-charge instructions absent evidence to the contrary
  • noting that jury is presumed to have understood and followed trial court’s jury-charge instructions absent evidence to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

375 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.