Skip to main content

Garza v. State

Citations

  • 298 S.W.3d 837
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8030
  • 2009 WL 3320183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]rial counsel’s failure to call an expert is irrelevant absent a showing that an expert witness was available to testify on this issue and the expert’s testimony would have benefitted Appellant”
  • Appellant’s state jail felony offense enhanced to third degree punishment under Section 12.35(c) and then enhanced to second degree punishment under former Section 12.42(a)(3), which is now Section 12.425(c).
  • “because of the jury’s affirmative finding of the use of a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense, the offense became an aggravated state jail felony punishable under Section 12.35(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Campbell, Pirtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.