Skip to main content

Garza v. State

Citations

  • 50 S.W.3d 559
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 2383
  • 2001 WL 361350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deleting duplicate language has no effect on charge if legally essential language remains
  • deleting duplicate language has no effect on charge if legally essential language remains

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Jennings, Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.